Sunday, April 14, 2019

MONEY 164 - PRIVATE BANK


THIS IS MY 164TH BLOG ON UNDERSTANDING MONEY TOOLS
April, 2019

In this blog/tutorial we are going to look at the synopsized history of America’s most famous “private” bank.  Are we looking at Bank of America, Chase, Wells Fargo?  No.  First, that list of banks consists of publicly traded corporations.

We are taking a look at our Central Bank, the Federal Reserve Bank.  I have read several books over the years about the Federal Reserve, “the who’s, what’s and why’s” and thought I would share some of the highlights with you.  If you read my blogs you know I don’t like banks, and there is good reason.  Watching ads and listening to bankers you think they are nice institutions wanting to help you.  The only thing a bank wants to help you with is divesting your money through their institutions, thus for them making a lot of money!  You will find out that our Federal Reserve Bank is right up there with them.

As a footnote on this topic, I spent 4 years in banking in Colorado as Senior Vice-president of Trust Company of America.  As a trust company we were bank chartered and did everything in the finance realm except commercial lending.  One seminar I was sent to while an employee with the bank was in Dallas, Texas.  The lecturer made a comment that left me startled.  “Your job/obligation is to locate money, individual as well as corporate, and get that money away from their control and under your management.”  Nothing about serving the customer’s needs!  That really set an accurate stage!

Footnote:  From the best of my knowledge the following is accurate from my readings and what little mind I have remaining in re-call.

CENTRAL BANKS AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE IN THE USA:
-       We had 2 Central Banks before the Federal Reserve.
-    1781-1836 called The Bank of North America, one and two.
-       Each bank had a 20-year charter.
-       1837-1862 State Chartered Banks (Free Banking Era) including how our Civil War was funded.
-       1863-1913 National Banks were established with an Act in 1863. This included the ability to create a uniform currency.
-       Certain founding fathers were against a Central Bank theory like Thomas Jefferson, however others like Alexander Hamilton were in favor.  The main concern was not to have anything to do with the Bank of England, but Hamilton did pattern the first bank after the Bank of England.  To disassociate further from the Bank of England they moved our Central Banks south from NYC to Washington DC.
-       Our current Federal Reserve Bank was created by an Act of Congress on December 23, 1913.
-       The Federal Reserve. 12 Federal Reserve Districts, and 12 Branches.  (Originally the forming founders wanted the Reserve to appear that it was represented across all of the US, although that is questionable.)

That gives a chronological overview for 150 years of banking.  The entire make-up for the Federal Reserve is what I hope you find interesting. 

In the early part of the 1900s two things were happening, one was that there was economic turmoil, and two most big business was done with very large corporations and wealthy families.  Financing business through cash flow was growing.  With growth of industry there needed to be more bank borrowing.  Banking was a shrinking market, and this trend needed reversing, with individuals as well as new companies going more into debt.  The old-line bankers were not happy!

Starting in about 1907 a group of the wealthiest “good old boys” in New York City came together to form ideas for a new Central Bank under their controls.  Many were from banking.  Included in the group were J.P. Morgan, Paul Warburg (Paul’s brother, Max, helped oversee the Rothschild money in Europe.), Nelson Aldrich (former senator of Rhode Island) and Secretary of the Treasury, Abraham Piatt.  This original group of people/bankers from NYC was estimated to control 1/4 of the world’s wealth.

There is something called a “Hegelian Dialectic”.  This can be applied to this era of turmoil and what these bankers were up to.  In this illustration, the bankers were going to exacerbate the economic problems, albeit phony but knowing how the public would perceive it, and then come up with solutions they designed, to their benefit and interests.  Thus, the layout for our Federal Reserve, and making these original investors even more wealthy.

These prominent individuals mentioned above went to Jekyll Island off the Georgia coast in secrecy to lay forth the plans of a new central bank.  As the next few years went by, and they were closer to presenting the plans to President Wilson and Congress, they decided on a new name distancing itself from the association of banking, calling it The Federal Reserve; enacted in 1913.  Most people even back then were suspect of bankers, and their intentions.  This private, authoritarian and autonomous institution created a banking monopoly under the guise of the Federal Reserve.  The member banks along with individuals were investors and paid a yield.

As enacted the Federal Reserve was set up as a private corporation, not connected to the US government, but to stabilize the US dollar so that such things as “runs on banks” would not happen.  Individual banks could borrow from this main bank.

Who are the investors in the Federal Reserve?  No one will know.  The Freedom of Information Act prevents any disclosure.  I would suspect the same wealthy power players are duplicated with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.  A few names would be the Rothschild Family, Rockefeller Family, several of the “old line” families from the turn of the century around 1900 as well as the big banks of today; the carry over of the J.P. Morgan/Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America and others.

Even though the Federal Reserve Board is not connected to the US Government the Chairman and Vice-Chairman, (whether a man or woman), are appointed by the president of the United States.  All decisions and regulations are to be independent of the government.

Money controls the US and its people.  The control and decisions for policy are made by the Federal Reserve Bank.  Besides other things, the Federal Reserve Board dictates interest rates, the amount of money outstanding and to be printed, thus the inflation rate (Inflation Theory).  The Federal Reserve is “big business”.  It wants inflation as payments made down the road on debt will be paid back in “cheaper” dollars because of the erosion of purchasing power!

How does this all work?  The Federal Reserve Board works in conjunction with our Treasury.  As the US Government goes more into debt we need to sell our debt instruments (bonds) to raise money.  The Federal Reserve is the orchestrator in the transaction and very incestuous in nature with Wall Street firms which sell the bonds worldwide.  The investment banking firms make a fortune on the commissions paid on these transactions, and after market.  Many of the old-line families owned these investment banks.  These days the Federal Reserve uses digitized currency on balances, thus the actual printing of money is not what it was years past.

What happens to risk?  A prime example is 2008-2009.  We did financially fail, and what happens?  The banking institution is too big to fail, and the American public bailed out the system!

So with the creation of the Federal Reserve Board it was meant to be 1) private, 2) quite secret, 3) all controlling 4) purposely imbedding debt upon people, companies and countries 5) and a huge money maker with little risk?  Yes!

Look at this reality.  The power the US and the Federal Reserve have and yet very little gold or substance lies behind the whole structure in today’s world of digitized money.

Much of the same can be said for Central Banks representing countries around the world.  We have set the stage.

Let’s quickly look at our currency.  Pick out a few bills from your wallet or purse.  I’ll take a $1 bill.  At the top of the front side it says “Federal Reserve Note”, nothing about our government, but the “private agency”.  It says, “Washington DC”.  The Department of the Treasury has authorized it, and the Secretary of the Treasury has signed the bill.  As many of the original founders of this nation were “free Masons” it has a temple and the “third eye”. (My father and grandfather were Masons, my grandfather a 33rd Degree, so I grew up with a bit of this knowledge.)  I also pulled out a $20 note.  Again, at the top it states it is a Federal Reserve Note.  It doesn’t say where it was printed, but is signed by the acting Treasurer of the US.  On the back side,  it holds a nice picture of the White House.  The point I am making is that “our money” is from the Federal Reserve.

I hope you found this blog of interest and learned something about our banking system.

Also, a couple of blogs ago I finished by stating an old Yiddish saying, “Man plans, God laughs”, meaning that life is unpredictable.  A good friend of mine, Don Stern, thought it to be negative and suggested the following,
“Man produces with good will and character, and God rewards.”  Don’s been very successful in a varied life from business to snow skiing, windsurfing, race car driving and flying his own twin engine plane.  Perhaps we should all listen to his words of wisdom!








Wednesday, April 10, 2019

MONEY 163 - LEARNINGS


THIS IS MY 163RD BLOG ON UNDERSTANDING MONEY TOOLS
April, 2019

My blogs are written with the premise that “it is far better to teach someone how to catch a fish, than give them a fish”.  We have all heard this from years past however America does not apply it well, all the way through to today’s teachings.  With my intentions it is to teach you practicalities in today’s business, give you hands on illustrations, render basic vocabularies in various industries, and most of all make you think!  There is another old saying: “I wish I knew then, what I know now”.  These blogs are meant to teach you to analyze better “now”, rather than viewing things superficially.  Perhaps it could save you a lot of time and money!

Let me point out how we have screwed up.  With myself, it was my basic public school education, grades 1 through 12, with learning from rote memorization, or repetitive learning, and little free-thinking permitted. At some point a good teacher needs to transfer memorized material into the practical that can be used, and associated with each day to attract the student’s interest.  I always wondered why a teacher should be teaching a subject when I didn’t think they were the best at a subject, and without free-thinking the subjects/topics were very boring to me.

As I state over and over, everything results from cause and effect.  Going back to my first statement that it is better to teach people how to catch fish, let’s show a prime example that exists today, from 150 years ago.  Let’s go to slavery and president Lincoln in the white house around 1861-65.  Quite complicated, however Lincoln believed that there should possibly be a re-colonization of the blacks, and included would be to send the black slaves back to their indigenous roots or a new colony.  Money was part of this solution, and also the problem as to why it did not happen.

Where am I going with this?  With post-emancipation the Caucasian white people never thought of teaching the African Americans/slaves how to be free, think on their own, and teach them how to make a good living. (How to catch their own fish!) We are paying for these downfalls today in society.  It will get worse with the financial separation between the upper classes and the lower class.

In parallels today, it is the shortsightedness of the wealthy with greed and greater separation of classes.  Right after WWII we did not have this and the middle class worker made a good income, no longer.  This problem will only grow in magnitude over the next few years and destroy our country.  I am afraid that either we correct the issues now, or our country will vote to change in favor of socialism.  That cannot benefit this country as we are already too far in debt to make socialism work satisfactorily.

In today’s education system, except for the schools in the wealthy communities, I see the same problems that have existed for years, and these kids are tomorrow’s leaders; ill prepared to take on the challenges.  Few people care, therefore constructive changes will not happen.

Now, let’s look at business.  We have not created many good companies the past 20 years, and become a service economy.  Investing has become gambling; so much money being tossed at mediocre product. It’s not just new companies and the stock markets.  Look at TV programs the last 20 years.  Except for the news there isn’t much on TV.  Most programs are designed for lower-middle IQ.  Music? In my eyes little great composed; perhaps the best coming out from our “”new” country western.  The medical industry has improved however at an exceptional cost to insurance companies and taxpayers.  Supposedly the $800 billion a year we spend on the defense budget has brought forth some nice, new shiny weapons for mass destruction!

To rationalize an investment in a company we have gone from a “bottom line”/pre-tax earnings analysis to a revenue based justification for investment; no need to “make money”. (Take a look at the companies on the NASDAQ.)  Few companies make the deans list these days.  Apple made the big come-back in the 1990s when Steve Jobs re-entered his company.  The problem with growth they are finding out is that not everyone needs a new I-Phone every year, nor a new computer, so they are trying to see if they can lure their 1.3 billion past customer base into other product lines.  Google is a winner.  Facebook, I gave as much hope for as the “pet rock”.  They are gathering and selling your private information, but as soon as you are totally sick of looking at your friend’s animals and children’s portraits they should be gone.  Twitter, etc.?

The company Lyft went public.  Going public is the only way to make big money.  It makes the insiders very wealthy, and immediately.  For today’s blog we are going to size this up.  Hopefully, you aren’t one of the buyers of Lyft stock.  Let me show you why.  Uber is watching and most likely will make an Initial Public Offering (IPO) in the not so distant future.  First to look at Lyft’s financial business composition.  Both Lyft and Uber run about the same in revenues and losses…not profits!  For every dollar in revenue both companies take in, they lose $.30, or 30% loss.  They say they are a “share ride” business thus a “green business” which sells to many a young person.  Is this really accurate?  I recently saw an ad for Uber drivers.  It was the picture of a young male “stud” standing next to a nice newer car.  The caption was drive for Uber guaranteed 300 trips of driving first month for $2100.  This perhaps attracted many new drivers.  Lyft will pay $2500, this includes tips.

Let’s look at it from a “green perspective”.  300 trips is a lot of driving, much, much more than a normal person would do; 10 hours a day, perhaps! So, this is not shared ride driving, but being a “cabbie”; there goes the “green” label.  Next, let’s look at it financially for the driver. If you take 300 trips of driving into $2100 it comes out to $7./trip.  Most drivers after expenses come out netting about $3.50/hour.  You’d be better off mowing lawns or shoveling snow up north.

You can rent a car to use from Uber as low as $269/month or use your own car.  The government states that it costs a person $.60/mile to drive a vehicle, amortizing all expenses into operating that vehicle such as gas, depreciation of vehicle, maintenance, insurance, etc.  In the case above with the Uber ad, if our average ride/trip is 10 miles that equates to 3000 miles per month, adjust for $.60/mile cost and that is $1800, that leaves you $300 profit. 

If you drive a year at this rate it is 36,000 miles per year.  Add into this your personal driving of perhaps 12,000 miles per year and you get 48,000 miles.  Cars essentially are worth nothing when they hit about 75-80,000 miles on the odometer.

In addition, one must remember that you need to add on “commercial” auto insurance to your personal policy for collision and extra liability up and beyond what Uber or Lyft cover.

Personally, I don’t ever see this business being economically viable for a business model.  Both companies are trying to eliminate the human driver, thus going driverless owning their vehicles.  Now, you go from a taxi cab format business, (and losing money), into the auto business.  With extra technology needed these driverless cars are going to be very expensive to operate per mile thus further lowering profitability.  Mass transit at a low cost that functions well and on a timely basis is the only thing that makes sense.

I hope you got some meaning out of this blog.  I am trying to get “you”, especially younger people, to “think” on your own through life and business entanglements.  It is inevitable that you will fail at times, but the object is to eliminate as many variables as possible.