Tuesday, March 27, 2018

MONEY 130 - EMPLOYMENT


THIS IS MY 130TH BLOG ON UNDERSTANDING MONEY TOOLS
March, 2018

I love to write about things that have impacted or affected my existence on earth.  I try to give the few readers of my blogs some accurate facts or insider information about industries I have been involved in that you won’t find in very many places. 

In the last blog we talked about inaccurate figures in the government reporting inflation.  I did not give you answers.  Think of a few.  At the end of this blog I will give you the rationale reason.

Today, I will write about employment in the US.  How did I pick this topic?  For one, most statistics I read are incomplete and therefore inconclusive as to how they may affect our business planning and investments.  Another reason for this topic was my heated debate on the employment topic with a friend last week.

Let’s start with the general and go more specific.  According to government numbers we have 325.7 million people in the United States as of 2017.  The Bureau of Labor Statistics gives a figure of 157,833,000 people who are employed.  Now, here is where my discussion became interesting.  I mentioned that President Trump said on television that unemployment remained close to full employment at around 4.1%, however there were 100 million Americans working age who aren’t working.  (Granted there is a certain percentage of these people who are not able to work because of physical or mental disabilities, or other issues like stay at home moms.)  I gave a retort to my friend that the figure I am acquainted with is about 95 million, less than Trump’s.  I won’t spend much more time on the discussion, but the friend said it was totally impossible.  Admittedly, I am not the smartest person on earth but don’t like to be referred to as an idiot!  Later I looked up this disputed fact and the Bureau of Labor Statistics gives the figure of 94,610,000….so I was off by a few people!  The US is not in full production.

As we are on this topic, I delved further into employment facts from the government and thought I would include these as a point of interest.  There are a lot of full-time government workers; 22 million for the Feds and at least another 7.5 million in state and local governments.  That is a one in 5 ratio to all employed.  Alaska has the greatest number of government workers and Wyoming second at 25.8% and 25.5% respectively.  I guess they hire quite a few to watch over the bears!  So, one in every five people is supported by a government agency.

In the number of employed the government estimates 28 million workers are part-time.  One in every ten school teachers holds a second job.

Now, this is where I have some fun with our employment figures.  I, as one human being, have been counted as two to nine employees for the past 20 or 30 years.  How?  As an example, in my case, which is not that dissimilar from many, currently hold two employment positions.  One is as an employee at a real estate company that places me on development projects on an “as needed” basis.  We are employees, not outside contractors.  I also work part time for another company.  This company has 25 employees on the roster, however there are only 2 to 7 employees working at any given time.  Most retailers do this as they are not inclined to pay benefits.  A few years back I was part of 2 retail stores I started.  I was noted as a full time employee at both, and had my real estate license with a brokerage firm and an employee with that firm.  Get the picture?

Let me proceed further with this picture of our US employment being exaggerated.  Our Target Store in town employs about 105 employees.  At any given time the store only uses about 25 employees.  Target’s Human Resource Department watches employee hours quite carefully so they won’t qualify for benefits.  The employees get to work anywhere from 8 to about 25 hours per week and several people work a second or third job to make ends meet.

Here is another specific example.  I was discussing this situation with a friend 3 years ago and he related another story.  One of his closest friends owned 450 fast food franchise stores.  To protect against liabilities this individual had each store set up as a separate corporation/partnership (a Limited Liability Corporation, LLC).  The man who owned these 450 stores was also listed as an employee of each.  So, in the stats one individual just turned into 450 employees.  We also discussed his workers; no full time except for perhaps a manager.  If employees needed a 40 hour work week they were permitted to work 20 hours at one store and then another 20 hours at another store owned by this man.  In this case you worked for two corporations.  No benefits paid to employees.

Are there illegals still working in the US, even with ICE and other government crackdowns?  Certainly.  Here is how it works.  Let’s take the real estate industry, again which I am very familiar with.  Some of the best drywallers/sheetrock workers are from a country south of our border.  The same goes for any kind of exterior stone work, concrete work and roofing.  A developer of a subdivision will line up his subcontractors for various work.  Illegals know that to comply with government regulations they need to supply the construction company with two forms of identification, one having a photo, the other being something like a Social Security Card or Passport.  This worker first goes and finds a place in the city that will provide false documents with a phony name.  This process only takes a few minutes and costs about $30.  The worker gives these to the contracting company and this meets the I-9 Form regulation which the employer retains on file.  Many of these workers work on a “piece-meal” basis.  As a for instance, if you are a dry-waller you get “X” amount of money for each piece hung.  This worker gets paid on a 1099 Form.  When the worker gets paid he takes the check, goes to one of the many “cash checking” operations around town, provides the false name and ID’s, and takes his money, less there percentage for cashing the check.

Going back to the friend on the employment figures, let me touch upon one more thing.  My friend wanted another dig at me (by the way we were on our second or third drink at this point).  He once was on a town council, and therefore knew everything.  He pointed out that I was a fairly large real estate developer and all developers were crooks!  Not true.  In the real world this is what happens.  Few developers are crooked and certainly don’t want to give cities, towns and councilman money they don’t deserve.  Many of the towns and cities in the US are broke.  Here are three examples that I personally know of or have been involved in:
-       A town where I was developing land was broke.  The mayor came to us and asked if we would buy more water rights for water taps, even though we were already approved and the taps not needed.  We paid the town $750,000 just for “good will”, and to move forward.
-       A friend desiring to develop a family farm in the suburbs of Chicago.  After everything passing city council and the mayor, an individual, and lawyer, on the council demanded that his law firm review the proposed bonds for a second time.  Review fee was established at $1 million; ridiculous and my friend pulled his project.
-       In the Milwaukee area a friend and developer’s 40 acre subdivision approved and then disapproved by the city.  It took my friend so long to fight this that it caused personal bankruptcy.  (The re-zoning of land, real estate taxes, legal fees, bank loans, etc. were the reason for his bankruptcy.)  The city lawyer said that if he wanted approval to proceed he and the city should receive a 25% interest in the project.  That happened and now the project is completed.
Bottom line.  Are the developers crooked, or are the forced to make “bribe” payments to town, mayors and councilmen?

Answer to the above inflation statements made in Blog 129.  Many government and insurance payments are “indexed” to inflation.  If the government included high inflation industries it would further bankrupt this country. This includes Social Security which is tied to, or “indexed”, to inflation.


No comments:

Post a Comment